Desperate
couples seek court's help
The Asahi Shimbun May 28, 2004
Looking to stir up a conservative
medical establishment, several couples desperate
to have children have joined two doctors in a
lawsuit that seeks expanded use of a test that
critics say could be exploited to create perfect
babies.
Currently, the Japan Society
of Obstetrics and Gynecology allows the test,
called pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD),
only in cases of possible severe genetic
disorders. Applications to use PGD must be filed
with the society for approval. The society has
yet to approve a single case.
Tetsuo Otani, who heads the
Otani Women's Clinic in Kobe, along with five
couples, filed the suit with the Tokyo District
Court on Wednesday against the Japan Society of
Obstetrics and Gynecology and four current and
past officers. Another doctor, Yahiro Nezu, of
Nagano Prefecture, is also listed as a
plaintiff. He was expelled from the society for
using in vitro fertilization to help a woman
become the nation's first surrogate mother.
Otani was evicted from the
society in April after admitting to the
unauthorized implementation of PGD on three
patients.
The group claims the society's
strict limitations on the use of PGD infringe on
their right to select medical procedures and to
bear children. They are seeking both to overturn
the society's guidelines and claim 77 million
yen in compensation.
PGD use was first reported in
the early 1990s in Britain and the United
States. It was initially designed to help people
with a family history of a genetic disease and
avoid transmitting it to their babies.
Embryos created through in
vitro fertilization are tested prior to their
transfer to the uterus.
However, there are major
ethical issues involved in PGD since parents
could use the technique to conceive what they
consider a ``perfect baby.''
On top of that, it is not an
easy process. Women experience discomfort when
eggs are extracted and the fertilization
procedure has just a 20-30 percent success rate.
Because of PGD's short
history, experts have yet to discover the
long-term effects of cell extraction at such an
early stage in life.
The government's Council for
Science and Technology Policy on May 12 held off
making a decision on whether to allow PGD. That
means the Japan Society of Obstetrics and
Gynecology's guidelines represent the only
standards in use in Japan.
One of the plaintiffs, a woman
in her 30s, has suffered repeated miscarriages.
``My right to have a healthy
baby is being taken away,'' she said. ``Would I
be inconveniencing anyone if I used the
procedure?''
The United States is
especially advanced in the use of PGD as a way
of treating infertility. By checking chromosomes
related to miscarriage, doctors can select and
transfer fertilized eggs that are less prone to
miscarriage. Women, therefore, suffer less -both
physically and psychologically.
The advances in reproductive
medicine overseas have led several couples to go
abroad to conceive, and have children who will
not suffer from genetic disorders.
However, members of the
Council for Science and Technology Policy have
raised questions about whether Japan is ready
for such advances.
In one study group, a
participant pointed out that while prenatal
diagnosis allows parents to choose whether to
carry the baby to term, that decision is coupled
with anguish. PGD eliminates the need for such a
decision.
However, that raised the
question if it is society's role to remove such
anguish.
The Japan Society of
Obstetrics and Gynecology is planning a public
symposium in June on PGD that will include
patients and citizens groups.
Ryuichi Ida, a law professor
at Kyoto University specializing in medical
ethics, noted that Japan and the United States
have different value systems.
``Unlike the United States
where people are free to do what they want as
long as they are not bothering others, in Japan
there is still strong opinion on only allowing
people to act in ways that do not go against
Japanese values,'' Ida said.
``As technology advances,
there will be a need for limitations on
technology that would eliminate life.''(IHT/Asahi:
May 28,2004) (05/28) |